Case studies
Reference case study5 minUpdated 2026-07-04

Cutting agentic coding spend without slowing product teams

A representative SaaS engineering workflow that reserves frontier tools for architecture and reviews while moving routine repo analysis to cached open models.

Audience

SaaS engineering teams

Metric

63% modeled reduction

Sources

3 official links

Starting point

The team was using premium assistants for everything: planning, boilerplate, file summaries, test scaffolds, reviews, and bug hunts. The result was hard to forecast because routine loops and retries consumed the same budget as high-value reasoning.

Routing change

The new policy split tasks into human-facing frontier work and routine automation work. Architecture, code review, and complex bug fixing stayed on frontier tools; repeated summarization and scaffolding moved to cheaper cached lanes.

  • Subscriptions became the human reserve.
  • Open models handled routine repo analysis.
  • Frontier API calls were capped by task class and confidence.

Result

The modeled architecture lowered monthly AI cost while keeping access to the strongest models for work that justified it. The important change was not swapping one model for another; it was pricing task classes separately.